slamist Whitewasher Reza Aslan Caught Lying Again About The Age Of Muhammad’s Child Bride ★#MyJihad #FilthyISLAM Muslims #HDL #DevyaniHumiliated #WhySoBiased

Hadith, Al Bukhari 4.268, “Allah’s Prophet [Mohammed] said, ‘War is deceit.’”

By David Wood, Answering Muslims – “In No God but God, Reza Aslan assures his readers that Aisha was merelybetrothed to Muhammad when she was nine years old, but that no sex took place until after she had reached puberty.

Islam’s most trusted sources, of course, tell a completely different story. For instance, here’s a brief sample of narrations from Sahih al-Bukhari, Sahih Muslim, and Sunan Abu Dawud (Islam’s three most respected hadith collections).

Sahih al-Bukhari 5158—Narrated Urwa: The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death).

Sahih Muslim 3311—Aisha reported that Allah’s Apostle married her when she was seven years old, and she was taken to his house as a bride when she was nine, and her dolls were with her; and when he (the Holy Prophet) died she was eighteen years old.

Sunan Abu Dawud 2116—Aishah said: The Apostle of Allah married me when I was seven years old. (The narrator Sulaiman said: Or six years.) He had intercourse with me when I was nine years old.

(For a much more thorough collection of narrations, see Sam Shamoun’s article here.)

Usually, when I hear a Muslim say that Aisha was older than nine when Muhammad had sex with her, I assume that the Muslim is simply ignorant of his sources (i.e., that the Muslim isn’t trying to deceive anyone; he’s merely ill-informed). Reza, however, claims to be an ‘internationally acclaimed scholar of religions’ (even though he’s an associate professor ofcreative writing). In carefully examining Islam’s sources as research for his book, surely he must have come across dozens of narrations reporting Aisha’s sexual relationship with Muhammad when she was only nine years old. The fact that Reza contradicts the unanimous testimony of his sources can mean only one thing: Reza is lying to his readers in an effort to make Muhammad seem better than he actually was.

Here’s a recent discussion of Reza’s claim (on ABN’s program Jihad Watch):

Source – Answering Muslims.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s